Follow
Publications: 30 | Followers: 0

Elementary Logic - cteapps.siu.edu

Publish on Category: Birds 0

Elementary Logic
PHIL 105-302Intersession 2013MTWHF 10:00 – 12:00ASA0118CSteven A. MillerDay 2
Implication
“There’s beer in the fridge.”When said to a visiting friend?When said to a customer?When speaking to an alcoholic partner?
Implication
Jon: We’re going out for drinks tonight.Frank: If we’re doing that, let’s go to Sidetracks or The Cellar.Jon: I’m banned from Sidetracks!What’s the conclusion?What’s implied?
Implication
The principle of charity: “in formulating implicit statements, give the arguer the benefit of the doubt; try to make the argument as strong as possible while remaining faithful to the arguer’s thought” (S, 12).In general, try to be a friendly and helpful reader.
Implication
“If you were a real American, you wouldn’t oppose (the military / paying taxes / gun control / other issue of the day).”Is it an argument?What’s the implied conclusion?
Implication
The Cubs are the best C-named MLB team. We know this because the Cardinals are the worst MLB team, and the worst cannot be the best.
Implication
1) The Cubs are the best C-named MLB team.2) The Cardinals are the worst MLB team.3) The worst cannot be the best.What’s the argument’s conclusion?
Implication
1) The Cubs are the best C-named MLB team.2) The Cardinals are the worst MLB team.3) The worst cannot be the best.What’s missing / implied to complete it?
Implication
1) The Cubs are the best C-named MLB team.2) The Cardinals are the worst MLB team.3) The worst cannot be the best.4) There are only two C-named MLB teams: the Cubs and the Cardinals.
Implication
In standard form:1) There are only two C-named MLB teams: the Cubs and the Cardinals.2) The Cardinals are the worst MLB team.3) The worst cannot be the best.4) [Therefore,] The Cubs are the best C- named MLB team.
Use / mention
Michelle Obama is the First Lady.Michelle Obama has two daughters.Michelle Obama has thirteen letters.
Use / mention
Michelle Obama has thirteen letters.“Michelle Obama” has thirteen letters.
Use / mention
The first letter of Jingle Bells is “D.”The first letter of “Jingle Bells” is “D.”The first letterof the words to“Jingle Bells” is “D.”
Formal / informal
These cookies cost twenty-five cents each. I have a dollar. I can buy four of them.1.00 / x = yx = .251.00 / .25 = y4 = y
Formal / informal
Informal logic:If it’s dark, then it’s night.It’s dark.Therefore, it’s night.Formal logic:D ⊃ ND∴ N
Formal / informal
D ⊃ ND∴ NIf I’m disappointed, then I’m nervous.I’m disappointed.And so I’m nervous.
Seventh Inning Stretch(“Take Me Out to the Ballgame, …”)
Argument evaluation
What makes an argumentgood?1) true premises2) conclusion at least probable, given 13) premises are related to the conclusion4) the conclusion can’t be undermined
Argument evaluation
1) true premisesIn many cases, this is obvious:“Carbondale is south of Chicago.”“Carbondale is north of Chicago.”But in others, it’s more problematic:“There is a treasure chest buried 500 feet below where I stand.”This truth of this latter kind isindeterminate.
Argument evaluation
1) true premisesFor our purposes, we’ll treat the latter kind of sentence, the indeterminate ones, as true. Or, more properly, we’ll see what happensif they were to be true.
Argument evaluation
2) conclusion at least possible, given 1.The concern here is that the argument isvalid, which means that there is a particular kind of relationship between the premise(s) and conclusion.
Argument evaluation
Two kinds of argument:deductiveandinductive1)deductive argument–an argument in which the conclusion followsnecessarilyfrom the premises
Argument evaluation
deductive validity–1) The conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.2) If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.3) It is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false.
Argument evaluation
If it’s dark, then it’s night.It’s dark.Therefore, it’s night.This argument is deductively valid:If its premises are true, its conclusion cannot be false.
Argument evaluation
Bill drove to work.Therefore, Bill must be over the age of 16.Notnecessarily valid: impossibility is notlegalorpracticalbut ratherlogical.It isconceivablethat Bill could be under 16 and driving to work, and so it is possible.
Argument evaluation
Bill drove to work.Anyone who drives to work must be over the age of 16.Therefore, Bill must be over the age of 16.Valid.
Argument evaluation
Adeductive argumentisvalidwhenit is impossible (in the strongest sense)for the premises to all be trueand the conclusion to be false.
Argument evaluation
2)inductive argument–an argument in which the conclusion islikelyto follow from the premises
Argument evaluation
91% of Polish people are Catholic.Pitoris a Polish person.We can conclude thatPitoris Catholic.This argument is inductive:If its premises are true, its conclusion may still be false.
Deductive or Inductive?
1) Historians know of no civilizations that worshiped lizards.2) So, humans never worshiped lizards.Inductive.
Deductive or Inductive?
1) No cats are purple.2)Sashabearis a cat.3) So,Sashabearis not purple.Deductive.
Deductive or Inductive?
1) The sidewalk is wet.2) Usually, the sidewalk gets wet from rain.3) It must have rained.Inductive.
Argument evaluation
What makes an argumentgood?1) true premises2) conclusion at least probable, given 13) premises are related to the conclusion4) the conclusion can’t be undermined

0

Embed

Share

Upload

Make amazing presentation for free
Elementary Logic - cteapps.siu.edu